{"id":10789,"date":"2021-05-10T19:04:13","date_gmt":"2021-05-10T17:04:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.white-baos.com\/?p=10789"},"modified":"2021-05-10T19:04:17","modified_gmt":"2021-05-10T17:04:17","slug":"new-judicial-success-timeshare-claim","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.white-baos.com\/en\/new-judicial-success-timeshare-claim\/","title":{"rendered":"Cancellation of a timeshare contract. Refund of money paid. New court success."},"content":{"rendered":"\n

In today’s article, we are going to talk about a recent court decision; obtained by our law firm. Relating to a timeshare claim. Where our claim was estimated. Consequently, the contract has been cancelled and part of the money paid asked to be returned to our clients.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The specific case: Marriott Son Antem Complex.<\/u><\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Our clients were sold a \u201cSilver\u201d week at the Son Antem complex of Marriott, in the Balearic Islands.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The contract was signed in 2002, with Law 42\/1998 about timesharing already in force.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the  information provided by the vendors, the MCVI companies, it was not specified:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

– the duration of the contract.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

– characteristics of the complex, property, etc.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

– rights of the buyers. Withdrawing from the contract, etc.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Much of this information, according to the seller, was in the general conditions or terms. A brochure, with certain information, that was never actually delivered to my clients. Despite the fact that the contract said it was.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n